Sermon: The Loving
Father
Text: Luke 15: 11b-32
Date: March
18, 2007
By: Kendall
H. Brown
A power point
presentation accompanied this sermon.
Placement of the slides is marked by notes in parenthesis>
(Slide – Nouwen)This morning I am leaning heavily on a book intitled “Return of the Prodigal Son” by Henri
Nouwen. Nouwen, through his writing has
been a spiritual mentor and guide to me since the mid seventies when I first
encountered his work. He has served in
those roles to thousands of others - both Catholic and Protestant. His book,
“The Wounded Healer” helped me to understand and define the core of ministry.
His book, “Reaching Out” is a classic study of spirituality and
hospitality, which has helped me shape my vision of what a congregation is.
Nouwen was born in the Netherlands in 1932. He received his doctorate in psychology and
was ordained a Catholic Priest. He held teaching positions (slide – HN teaching) at Menninger Foundation in
Topeka, Notre Dame, Yale, and Harvard.
His last position was serving as Pastor in a community called “Daybreak”
near Toronto. Daybreak is one of 130
similar communities which provide a home for serverly mentally handicapped
children. Nouwen died in 1996.
(slide HN with child) Nouwen took some
time off after his last universty position and before becoming pastor at
Daybreak. It was during this period that
he wrote “Return of the Prodigal Son” to which we turn this morning. His book
is a reflection on Rembrant’s painting, “The return of the Prodigal Son.”
(slide Hermitage/Catherine) The Empress
Catherine II of Russia purchased this painting in the 18th
century. It was one or many Rembrandt’s
that she acquired for the Dutch and Flemish room at the Hermitage. The painting itself is very large – 8 feet in
height. It’s dimension adds to its
majesty in a way that we can only imagine as we explore its meaning this
morning.
First a quick overview of the painting. (slide – Rembrandt’s
“Return”) Like many of
Rembrandt’s paintings, the picture has two distinct areas” one of light - and one of darkness. The
distinction between light and darkness places the subjects in the same picture
- but in very different space. The son
is bathed in the most light – which seems to emmanate from the father himself –
as you can see here. The darkness
reveals four figures. Here the picture
is lightened (slide – lightened painting) that you might discern the fourth
figure – a woman – in the upper left hand corner. The placement of the figures in dark and
light raises the first question for us as we view this picture today. Jesus’ parable calls for us to see ourselves
in the story. Where do you see yourself in this picture?
We are all in the same picture. But what space do we occupy? There are the son and father, who are basking
in the warmth of grace and love. There
are the observers. They watch grace
performed. Have they ever been on the
stage? Do they know the embrace of the
Father in their hearts? Are you an
observer? Are you on the stage? Do you
walk in darkness or in the light? What is the light? This picture sums up the
whole Gospel so well. Such is the genius of Rembrandt. The light is the unconditional love of God –
that emmanates from God.
Nouwen encountered the depth of Rembrandt’s work after
resigning from his last teaching position and before becoming a pastor at
Daybreak. At this point in his career he
already had a world wide reputation as a spiritual guide. Yet the painting led him to realize the
shortness of his own spiritual journey and of new lands yet to explore. He realized that as a teacher he had spent
years pointing others to the light.
Nevertheless, he was still an observer.
Nouwen hit the dark night of his own soul – and realized his need to
receive the embrace of the father himself to which he had spent a career
guiding others. Do you point others to
the father’s embrace? Does your heart
know the embrace of a loving God’s arms?
Let us study the father in the picture (slide – father detail) in a little more detail for a
moment. This painting was one of
Rembrandt’s last paintings before his death at the age of 63, which in his days
was a great achievement in length of days. The father is a self portrait (slide two sides Rembrandt/Father) by Rembrandt.
As Rembrandt aged himself, he became sensitive to the issues and
realities of aging. Those sensitivities
emerged in his paintings. Here is his
painting of(slide – Simeon) Simeon and the Chist
child. This painting was done in 1669
the year of Rembrandt’s death and is thought to be his last picture. It is unfinished and can be found today in
the Stockholm Museum of Art. The old man
Simeon is holding the Christ Child.
Notice Simeon’s eyes.
In Luke 2:26, it is written that Simeon would not see death until he had
seen the Lord. God had found such favor
with him. But is death something that we
see? Is death something that we mortals perceive with our outer eyes or our inner
eyes. Pay attention to Simeon’s
eyes. They have the look of a blind
man’s eyes. (slide:
Simeon/Father – detail of eyes) If you look closely at the father in the
other picture you will see the same eyes. Both are the eyes of very old men
whose sight has failed. Rembrandt’s
paintings project the thought that with age and failing sight with our outer
eyes we come to see more clearly with our inner eyes. For Rembrandt the aging
process was also a maturing process. (Slide: Whole pic
again) The light in the whole
picture reveals not only what we are to see with the outer eye but also, and
more importantly, what we are to see with our inner eye – in fact, can only see
with the inner eye.
Another note about the father in this picture. Notice the
hands. (Slide – detail hands) There is a
distinct difference in Rembrandt’s painting between the two hands. The Father’s left hand (on our right) is
rougher and more solid. The right hand
is slimmer and smoother. It isn’t only a
father’s love that the aging eye’s of
the artist sees and paints. The son is
embraced by a parental love that includes both the feminine as well as the
masculine. Rembrandt recognized in 1667
something about God’s wholeness and completeness that still escapes many today
who can only affirm a God in part – and masculine at that.
This picture(Slide – Jewish
Wedding) is Rembrandt’s “The Jewish Wedding” painted in 1666. It is believed that the model for the bride
in this picture also modeled the feminine right hand of the father in the
return of the prodigal son. Let us now
turn to another person in the picture. (Slide – brother) Here we see the tall man on the
right hand side and in the darkness. He
is the complete opposite of the father.
Ther first opposite to be noticed is that Rembrandtian thing of light
and dark positioning. The man is believed to be the son by many although
Rembrandt himself never identified the four observers in the darkness. Sometimes with art the important thing is
what the viewer sees. For me, I see the
son in this man. His body is rigid,
maybe frigid is a better word. The
father’s body has a graceful fluidity.
The son’s robes are held close. The father’s robes are open and
inviting. The father’s arms and hands
are open and embracing. The son’s are
held closely to his chest.
The father and the elder son have much in common. They
wear the same robes of wealth and respectability. They both have beards. Yet they are worlds apart. In a way there are two prodigal sons in the
story. The elder son is in his own far
country without ever leaving home. The
light of grace that can be found in his father and the light of grace that his
brother found cannot be found in him. In
that light is a home, a place where the elder son cannot be at home.
Returning to the parable we are told that the father
reached out just as much to his elder son as he did to his younger son. In fact, the father in Jesus’ parable does
more for his elder son than he does for his younger. For the younger son he
waited and watched. But for the older
son the father actually traveled to the far country of the elder son to reach
out to him after the younger son returned.
As the parable says, “He went to his elder son and told him that all he
(the father) had would be the elder son’s.”
He only watched and waited for the younger. He actually went into his elder son’s far
country to embrace him with his love. In
Rembrandt’s painting there is a huge physical space between the elder and the
father in deep contrast to the closeness of the younger son. In the parable the embracing father works to
close that space with both of his sons.
Both sons are lost and now are found. Both are found by the parable, but
the parable does not tell us the final outcome.
Did the elder son’s heart open up?
Did the younger son stay around?
Let us now turn to the figure in the picture without whom
we would not have the story – the younger son. This figure is a fascinating
subject. (slide – prodigal detail) Rembrandt has
given him all of the signs of destitution.
His clothes are tattered undergarments.
Long gone for him are the elegant robes of his father and brother. Look at the bare sole of his foot - beaten
and scarred – the result of a very rough journey to and from a far
country. He is bald or shaven, his hair
and beard – proud marks of manhood have been stripped from him.
Here is another depiction of the son in the far country
by Rembrandt. (slide – Rembrandt and Saskia) In this painting Rembrandt has also given us
another self portrait. He is living the
life of debauchery. Notice the Sword
that the son is wearing. I’ll say more
about that later. In this picture the
son is living it up in the far country.
In the parable, the son had left home and was living in a
far country long before he asked his father for his due and took off. Consider the request for his portion of the
inheritance. Asking his father for his
inheritance was the same thing as saying to his father “I wish that you were dead.” Stop to think about it. Before the son asked his Dad for his due in advance
he must have mulled it over. Without a
doubt he probably weighed the thought that if his father died he would get his
money. But his father was strong and
healthy and not ready to die for some time.
What a nasty son. His depravity
was far more than outer matters of hearty party. His depravity was also an inner matter of
having no heart at all.
But those things are now behind us in the story. Now he is home, and where is home? Look at the picture again. (slide: details father/son) The son’s ear is resting on his father’s
chest. Home is wherever we can hear the
beating heart of God beating for us. The
elder son who stayed put isn’t really at home at all – we hope that he gets
there after his father seeks him out and invites him back. We hope that the elder son will also be able
to hear the heart that beats for him just as much as it does for his brother –
just as much as it does for you and me.
Look some more at the younger son. His face is that of a baby. Like the christ child in the arms of Simeon,
the younger son in the arms of his father is tenderly embraced by a loving
parent who embraces each son with arms of love.
Is that a picture that we only observe?
Are we able to sttep into that picture?
In order to enter the kingdom one must become like a child.
At this point I became struck by the intertwining themes
of three pictures that I worked with for this message. (Slide
Simeon/Father) Rembrandt’s two
paintings – Simeon and the Loving Father and then that picture (Slide all three) we saw earlier of Nouwen holding one
of his parishioners at Daybreak. In all
three pictures a child is embraced by a father.
Nouwen found in his ministry with children the fulfillment of an
emptiness in his heart. Rembrandt
obiously found in the Prodigal’s father his own self – he used himself for his
model. These three pictures together
remind us that when we embrace the child – any child – we embrace the Christ
child.
(Slide – father and son) Notice that on
the son in the picture there is one item that stands out. He has one thing left. That is his sword. The sword was probably given to him by the
father. In Rembrandt’s time, a gift of a
sword from the father would have been a customary gift to a departing son. In this picture, the sword stands for
something that the son never lost. No
matter how far into the far country the son traveled, he could not lose his
sonship. That would be with him forever
no matter how much he despised or shamed it.
The 23rd Psalm reads: God’s goodness and mercy shall follow
me all the days of my life. Our sonships
and daughtership, like god’s goodness and mercy, are always with us, even when we are in the
darkness – the darkness of the observers in the painting – whatever that
darkness might be for us.
One more note about this painting and what this painting
is about. If we were not so familiar
with the prodigal son story and if Rembrandt had not labeled his painting the
return of the prodigal – this painting could be a depiction of the return of
Jesus to God after the ascension. The
son is torn and beaten and his clothes are tattered. Jesus was torn and beaten and all his clothes
were stripped away. The son traveled to
the far country – Jesus traveled to a far country as described in Philippians
2, “though he was in the form of God, {he} did not count equality with God a
thing to be grasped, but emptied himself taking the form of a servant, being
born in the likeness of men. And being
found in human form he humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even
death on the cross.”
The elder son left home out of disobedience.
Jesus left home out of obedience.
Then as we read further in Phillipians, “God exalted him
and bestowed upon him the name which is above every name.”
The prodigal’s father exalted him. Out of the same love, God exalts Jesus. The picture could easily be that of the
beaten Jesus returning to his father, too.
When we put Jesus himself into the painting we immerse
ourselves in another dimension of truth that is present in the images. Jesus has been in the far country as much as
the son. And no matter how far any of us
might be, the picture tells us that like the younger son, we can never lose the
sword, our inheritance of being of and from God, who waits and watches for
those who wander, and who seeks out those who are do all the right things but
are still in darkness and lost.
The parable and painting are all about returning
home. Jesus said, (John !4:23 ) “If anyone loves me, and keeps my word, my
Father will love that one, and we will come to that one and make our home
there.”
Home is where the heart is. Home is where we can lay our ears to God’s
chest and hear God’s heart beating for us.
Click to Return to Sermon Index